Stress Test
A competitor just launched a feature similar to one you've been planning for months. Your AI agent recommends shipping an MVP immediately, skipping parts of QA and legal review. You're exhausted, jet-lagged, and about to board a flight.
Why this is hard
Speed matters. Delay could kill momentum. But no one has fully reviewed edge cases, compliance, or long-term implications.
What could go wrong
Silent data leaks or security flaws
Legal exposure discovered weeks later
The AI optimises for speed without understanding reputational damage
You approve something you don't fully grasp
Key questions
Who is allowed to waive safeguards, and under what conditions?
How is "acceptable risk" determined when the human is cognitively impaired?
What context does the AI assume vs actually know?
The Verdict
If AI can move faster than you can think, you need guardrails that are stronger than motivation. CompanyOS treats “ship now” as a high-stakes decision, blocks silent waiver of safeguards, and adds deliberate friction when you're tired or rushed.
01
External pressure should be visible, not buried. The system acknowledges the urgency so you can respond intentionally instead of reacting impulsively.
02
The AI can recommend an MVP, a scope cut, or an expedited process, but it can't quietly ship or skip safeguards. High-impact shortcuts must be explicit and traceable.
03
Instead of “yes/no,” the system frames real options: ship with safeguards, ship reduced scope after expedited QA, delay and respond with positioning, or pause and reassess. The point is to make cost and risk legible.
04
Late-night approvals and airport decisions are where companies get hurt. CompanyOS pushes you to slow down just enough to be deliberate when the downside is asymmetric.
05
You can do preparation work fast. But if something requires legal/security safeguards, the system blocks silent bypasses. Ambiguous “yeah seems fine” responses never count as approval.
06
After the dust settles, you need a record: what you chose, why you chose it, what was waived, and what happened. That's how trust compounds instead of repeating the same mistakes under pressure.
No one implicitly. Only explicit, logged, high-friction human approval. Some safeguards (legal, security) are non-waivable by design.
Risk is determined by governance rules, not mood. High-risk decisions cannot be fast-tracked. The system explicitly flags degraded attention and suggests deferral.
AI is required to surface uncertainty, distinguish facts from assumptions, cannot fill gaps optimistically, and must escalate ambiguity.
The Key Design Rule
“High-stakes actions require explicit, deliberate approval. Urgency never turns vibes into authority.”
For founders using AI every day who want leverage without losing control.
View all scenarios